[email protected]mail.com has comments on 5 sites

Site icon

The NESS / theness.com

The New England Skeptical Society is a non-profit educational organization founded in 1996 to promote science and reason. Blogs NeuroLogicaBlog is a daily blog...

Comment Date Name Link

It seems you have misunderstood the article entirely, perhaps intentionally. Hard to tell.

My whole point is that science has failed to inform the public. All you did is restate what I said. The rest of what you said about science crawling toward the truth is clearly stated in my piece.

And if you think that I, a typical non-scientist do not understand such things as the details of nutrition science, that is MY point, not your criticism of my point.

First, try to understand what I wrote. Then criticize. Works better that way. I didn’t see anything you said that wasn’t what I said that you misunderstood or took out of context.

Or are you just an outragist? See: http://blog.dilbert.com/post/109482303301/outragists-are-the-new-awful

Scott Adams

2015-02-17 02:08:41 ScottAdams
Site icon

Dan Braganca / danbraganca.com

Snubbing Eris, Searching for Truth

Comment Date Name Link
I notice you have to change my opinions from what I wrote to something a little bit crazy before you can debate them.

You cleverly change my prediction about chemical castration into a "should" that wasn't in my writing.

You turn my common sense observation that nature has a role in our actions into a crazy absolute: "if every fleeting impulse can’t be acted upon..."

And so on. I just picked two.

You should try arguing with stuff I actually said. You'll find it more challenging.

Scott Adams
2011-07-01T15:09:52-04:00 Scott Adams
Site icon

We Hunted The Mammoth / wehuntedthemammoth.com

Surviving the Trumpocalypse

Comment Date Name Link
Here's your reading comprehension test that I assume all of you will fail:

If I say all men have a natural urge to eat, and some men are cannibals, have I implied that all men are natural cannibals? Did I condone the practice of eating people?

Scott Adams
2011-06-25T09:05:46-05:00 Scott Adams
Comment Date Name Link

It's fascinating to watch strangers debating what they imagine is in my head.

On the wife/girlfriend beating/shooting questions, there's no credible evidence that Sheen did those things. In the "normal" world, a guy who has been accused of the same sort of crime several times is probably guilty. In the celebrity world, it doesn't mean the same thing.

I say that as a person who has often been accused of being a holocaust denier, creationist, misogynist, and racist. That's just the starter list.

I can't say Sheen didn't do any of the things he has been accused of. But the evidence against him is as credible as the evidence that Osama used his wife as a human shield.

2011-05-08 09:51:17 Scott Adams
Site icon

Cheap Talk / cheaptalk.org

A blog about economics, politics and the random interests of forty-something professors

Comment Date Name Link
Interesting theory :-) 2011-04-27T09:08:31-05:00 Scott Adams